
My daughter, however, is too young to be sexy, and I hope she will continue to be for at least the next 16-17 years. My daughter is a child, and by definition, a child is not sexy. The nightmarish parents from Toddlers and Tiaras aside, I would like to think that MOST parents agree that children have no business being sexy. We might disagree about at what age a child moves into adulthood, but to save time, let's settle on the idea that anyone who hasn't hit puberty yet is still a child, and has no place associating with the word sexy, either in their own minds or in the minds of others. Looking around at the costumes that will be available for my baby next year, though, I wonder if I am alone in my analysis of a child's sexiness, because sexy appears to be just what the makers of Halloween costumes want my pre-tween daughter to be.

Fortunately, there ARE cute, unsexy butterfly costumes out there if you look hard enough. Walmart has an awesome one that I wish I had found earlier, and you can find plenty on Google as long as you have the time to overlook the less appropriate versions. Most of the more modest costumes are designed for infants and toddlers, but some come in larger sixes (the one from Walmart is available though a child's size 6). I got my daughter's costume at a yard sale, and it is similar with full pants and sleeves. I am sure my daughter will be a darling butterfly, and I know I have learned a valuable lesson about costume selection that will serve me well over the next couple of years.
For now at least, dressing my daughter modestly and appropriately falls to me. The costume companies are not evil; they provide what people are willing to buy. It is up to Mom and Dad to decide that certain outfits aren't appropriate for their little girls, and that is what I will do. For now, the hurdle has been cleared. But what if my daughter doesn't want to be a butterfly next year? What if she would rather be an astronaut?
She is out of luck, then. I did a Google search for "Halloween girl astronaut costume," and got a bunch of costumes...for boys. I thought perhaps my search had been too broad, so I went to different stores, such as Target, Walmart, and Costume Express and searched their sites directly. I got the same results. My daughter can be Princess Leia, but she can't walk on the moon. The ONLY girls' astronaut costumes I could find were designed for strippers - oh, I mean, adults. I got similar results when I searched for "Halloween girl police costume." There ARE policewomen costumes out there for little girls who dream about strutting their stuff in sequins, heels, and a miniskirt in front of suspects, but none for little girls who would like to actually dress up as, uh, a policewoman. Frankly, I find these costumes considerably more offensive than the pixie-butterfly above. God forbid our real policewoman had to walk around in such a get-up; I can't imagine how anyone could earn the respect of their male colleagues, much less chase down a perp. When compared to the boys' police costumes, which look like true police uniforms, the difference stings.
I had only slightly better results when I searched for "Halloween girl sports costumes," since most of the costumes were sexified baseball players or cheerleaders, but there were a couple normal baseball costumes and a very cute referee costume that were mostly appropriate (both had short shorts instead of long pants, but were otherwise unobjectionable - good, perhaps, for Halloween in Florida). In general, because costumes are divided into boys' and girls' costumes, my daughter would have to buy a boys' costume if she wanted to be an astronaut or a policewoman-sans-the-stripper. And shop in the boys' section we will, or make our own costumes, in order to follow her dreams. But there may come a time when she will feel a real or imagined stigma from shopping for boys' clothing. She might avoid being an astronaut because she doesn't want to wear a boys' costume, and that could affect how she views what is appropriate for women, and for her own future.
I do not have an objection to girls looking like girls and boys looking like boys (as is evidenced by my selection of a butterfly costume for my daughter). Growing up, I never dreamed of being an astronaut: I wanted to be a princess, an angel, a cat, etc. If my daughter takes the girly-girl route for Halloween, I will be happy to provide, but I do not want my daughter to adjust her aspirations for life around what she believes to be a feminine or masculine occupation. These costume limitations send a clear message: boys are astronauts, boys are policemen, and it is more important that girls look sexy in heels and skirts than get the job done. Apparently, 21st century Halloween is stuck in a 1950's nightmare. It is disheartening, but as parents, for the sake of our kids, we need to continue to push the envelope, to refuse to buy costumes that sex up little girls and insist that companies supply costumes that will encourage our daughters to shoot for the moon.
***Credit where credit is due: I was delighted to find that there is a wide range of girls' doctor costumes available online, with scrubs in a variety of colors (not just pink), and the same goes for girls who might dream of going into the army - they can pick from mini-skirts or full-body khakis. This is great progress. But flipping through the catalogs, she is bound to notice, as I did, that even the doctor and army costumes only have male models, not female, even if the costumes themselves are listed as unisex.
Another great article as the Season of Sexy Children progresses:
ReplyDeletehttp://www.huffingtonpost.com/david-valdes-greenwood/a-costume-too-far-what-wo_b_999996.html